An honest comparison

How PlanSight compares

A lot of what we do is now table stakes — and we’ll say so. Here’s what everyone does, and where we genuinely go further.

CapabilityPlanSightAI code-check toolsGov permit softwareManual review
Reads every sheet, all disciplines, in one passstrong players~often intake only~slow, varies
Cited findings tied to code references~someby hand
Annotated PDF as the deliverablepinned to the sheet~varies~Bluebeam layersmanual redlines
Uses the exact code your permit’s date locks inby its datecurrent only~if tracked by hand
Shows the exact edition used + confidence on every reporton every cover·
Cross-sheet consistency (plan vs schedule)rarely~if caught
Re-checks every revision / resubmittal~varies~manual
Grounded Q&A assistant on the planAsk PlanSight
Serves homeowners, architects AND city reviewers~mostly AEC~city-side·
Honest about places with no building code at all~local knowledge
We test it the same way it runs for you~self-reportednot published·
Your data stays private — only you can access it~varies~varies·
yes~ partial / varies no· n/a

Where we go further

The exact code for your permit

We find the building code that governs your permit — by its date — and check it against what your plans claim. Most tools only know today’s code.

It shows its work

Every review states the exact code edition it used, how local it resolved, and its confidence — right on the cover. Most tools just hand you one self-reported accuracy number.

One review, three audiences

Homeowners, architects, and the city/county reviewers who approve the plans — in one product. Rivals pick a side.

What we test is what you get

We test PlanSight the exact same way it runs for you — no bait-and-switch — against real correction letters cities actually sent.

See it on your own plans

Upload a set and get the same review back — in minutes, before you file.

Review my plans